A basic definition of the word “religion” is “the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.” Based on that definition, all of the major faiths throughout the world could be classified as religious sects. That should also include Mormonism, the doctrines and practices of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (inadvertently referred to as the Mormon Church by the media and others), however, there are many people who do not view Mormonism as a “religion” in the Christian sense of the word, but rather they view it as a practicing cult.

Merriam-Webster.com defines the word “cult” as “a religion regarded as unorthodox or spurious to include its body of adherents.” Another definition of the word “cult” is “a relatively small group of people having religious beliefs or practices regarded by others as strange or sinister.” Both of these definitions could adequately describe how many people view The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and its members, known as Latter-day Saints (but often referred to as Mormons), with the exception that the membership in The Church of Jesus Christ has grown significantly since its inception both in number of members and area covered. In 1830 when the Church of Jesus Christ was just beginning, there were only 6 members, but today there are over 14 million members worldwide.

It is interesting to note that Merriam-Webster uses the word “religion” in its definition of the word “cult.” Of equal interest is that suitable synonyms for the word “cult” are worship, religion, and adoration. Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints worship and adore Jesus Christ, the same Jesus Christ whose teachings are found in the Christian Holy Bible, and whose name the Church itself bears. Therefore, it would seem that after all the pieces of the proverbial puzzle are conjoined, it would prove more precise to say that Mormonism is a religion, but it is a religion that is misunderstood by many.

Is Mormonism a “New Religious Movement”?

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, defines a “New Religious Movement” as:

A new religious movement (NRM) is a religious community or ethical, spiritual, or philosophical group of modern origins, which has a peripheral place within its nation’s dominant religious culture. NRMs may be novel in origin or they may be part of a wider religion, in which case they will be distinct from pre-existing denominations. Scholars studying the sociology of religion have almost unanimously adopted this term as a neutral alternative to the word cult, which is often considered derogatory. [1]

Use of the term “New Religious Movement” normally requires that the group with whom the term is associated be both of recent origin and different from existing religions.

Some scholars also have a more restricted approach to what counts as “different from existing religions”. For them, “difference” applies to a faith that, although it may be seen as part of an existing religion, meets with rejection from that religion for not sharing the same basic creed or declares itself either separate from the existing religion or even “the only right” faith.

NRMs vary in terms of leadership; authority; concepts of the individual, family, and gender; teachings; organizational structures; and in other ways. [1]

Based on the aforementioned information, Mormonism could be thought of in a sense as a “New Religious Movement, but not necessarily as a “new” religion.

What distinguishes The Church of Jesus Christ from other Christian churches?

Mormonism, the doctrines and teachings of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, is not a “new” religion. The Church had its beginnings in 1830, with 6 members gathered together in a small log cabin in upstate New York. Joseph Smith, the one chosen by God to bring forth the restored gospel of Jesus Christ in these the latter-days, was the first President and Prophet of The Church of Jesus Christ.

Many may classify Mormonism as being non-Christian because some of its doctrinal teachings differ from those of mainstream Christianity. One doctrine in particular is the doctrine of the Godhead. Much of Christendom, not all of it, believes in the doctrine of the “Trinity” – a term which is not found within the entire text of the Holy Bible.

The word “Trinity” comes from the Latin noun “trinitas” meaning “three are one.” Therefore, the doctrine of the Trinity expresses the belief or idea that God is one being made up of three distinct personages – the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit – who are co-equal in existence, as well as co-eternal in communion. Mormons, or Latter-day Saints as they are properly called, believe and teach as part of their doctrine that God the Eternal Father, His Son, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit are indeed distinct personages of the Godhead, and they are indeed one, but one in purpose and in mission, but not one in the same person.

Stephen Edward Robinson, a religious scholar and apologist, and a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, commented in his May 1998, New Era magazine article titled Are Mormons Christian?

What Latter-day Saints do not believe is the non-Biblical doctrine formulated by the councils of Nicaea (A.D. 325) and Chalcedon (A.D. 451) centuries after the time of Jesus—the doctrine that God is three coequal persons in one substance or essence. We do not believe it because it is not scriptural. As Harper’s Bible Dictionary states: “The formal doctrine of the Trinity as it was defined by the great church councils of the fourth and fifth centuries is not to be found in the New Testament.”

Jesus didn’t teach the Nicene doctrine of the Trinity. The New Testament writers didn’t have any idea of it. The doctrine itself wasn’t invented until centuries later. So one can’t say the Latter-day Saints are not true Christians for not accepting it, unless one also excludes Jesus, his disciples, and the New Testament Church, who similarly did not know or teach it. [2]

Does the use of additional scripture indicate that Mormonism is a new religion?

Another reason that some believe that Latter-day Saints are not Christian, and perhaps among one of the reasons given most often, is that Latter-day Saints use additional volumes of scripture in their teaching and for their personal study. One volume of scripture that arouses particular attention and interest is the Book of Mormon. In fact, it is because Latter-day Saints use the Book of Mormon that they have obtained the nickname “Mormons” and the Church is referred to as the “Mormon Church.”

There are those who will contend that the Bible contains all the scripture that man needs. They further profess that there are no new revelations as God no longer speaks to man as He once did. Such preconceived notions supposes that the Heavens have been closed. Latter-day Saints believe that the Heavens are not closed and that God’s Word never ceases, therefore, He still speaks to the hearts and minds of men today, as He did in times past.

Regarding the Book of Mormon, Latter-day Saints testify it is a companion volume of scripture to the Holy Bible. They further assert that the Book of Mormon does not outweigh or attempt to discredit the Holy Bible by any means, but it does complement and enhance the teachings contained therein, affording the reader of the sacred text more clarity and better comprehension. Both the Book of Mormon and the Holy Bible testify of the life, love, and ministry of Jesus Christ, the Savior and Redeemer of the world. The same Jesus Christ whom Latter-day Saints worship and adore.

If using the Book of Mormon classifies Mormonism as a “new” religion. Then what is to be said of the Catholic Bible, or the New World Translation which the Jehovah Witnesses use. Does that classify the Catholic Church and the Jehovah Witness as “new” religions as well?

Stephen Edward Robinson in the New Era magazine article titled “Are Mormons Christian?” commented on this subject:

I have frequently asked non-LDS critics exactly which Book of Mormon teachings about Jesus Christ they disagree with. Invariably the response has been that it isn’t what the Book of Mormon says that is offensive to them—it is the Book of Mormon itself. Most anti-Mormons reject the LDS scriptures without knowing or caring what those scriptures actually teach about Christ. [2]

Conclusion: Is Mormonism a “new” religion?

The question that begs an answer is not necessarily, “Is Mormonism a “new” religion?” but rather, “Does Christendom accept Mormonism as a religion?” And if Mormonism is accepted as a religion, then the follow-on question might be, “What is it that causes many Christians to criticize this one religion as they do?” Perhaps it is exactly as Stephen Edward Robinson stated in his article:

You see, it isn’t really the LDS doctrine of Christ that is objectionable; rather, it is the claim that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God, that the Book of Mormon is God’s word, and that the gospel has been restored to the earth in the latter days. [2]

Scripture teaches, “Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?” (Matthew 7:16; compare 3 Nephi 14:16). And so, you are cordially invited to “Come and see” for yourself what Mormonism truly teaches by visiting and worshipping with a local LDS congregation near you.

Additional Resources:

The Lord Jesus Christ in Mormonism

Request a Free Book of Mormon

You Are Invited to Worship with a Local LDS Congregation

Some of these students have shared their thoughts, insights, and reflections. We invite you to take a look at their epiphanies and discoveries as they delve into the scriptures.

Mormon Thoughts: Perspectives on War

During the latter part of the book of Alma and the beginning of Helaman (in the Book of Mormon), the faithful people and the disbelievers began to disagree so much with each other that they were going to war. The decision to remain strong in the faith every waking moment and to refuse to break away or back down from evil is to be admired here, just as courage is the choice to stand tall in the face of your worst fears.

We indeed now live in the latter days, even the last dispensation on earth. Therefore, failure is simply no longer acceptable for those chosen to be of this generation of souls to dwell in the world. Although the choice is up to you, the decision to use violence in defense of all that is good can be a daunting one full of solemnness. But as we learned from the example of righteous military leaders such as Moroni himself, victory can be had while not delighting in the shedding of blood. It is not required to kill all enemies, but to make sure they are no longer a threat. When you undertake to go beyond the call of duty and seek blood and vengeance, you will have lost the favor of the Almighty. As an extreme case, the 2,000 “stripling warriors” were young men who had the bravery to take up arms or fill in where their fathers could not, but they remain faithful and true to the teachings of their mothers and succeeded with God’s help.

In considering the decision between pacifism and activism, remember the duties of parents declared by the First Presidency [leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints] in “The Family: A Proclamation to the World.” Fathers are responsible as to “provide, protect, and preside” and mothers are to be equal partners in this sacred honor of caring for the family. I cannot personally condone the choice to stand aside as my family is attacked while not invoking my duty to protect them. There are certain unspeakable things that you must not permit to be done unto your family if you can help it. Consider the gentle hearts of the women and children that so bless our lives and remember our responsibility towards them.

Some of these students have shared their thoughts, insights, and reflections. We invite you to take a look at their epiphanies and discoveries as they delve into the scriptures.

Mormon Thoughts: The Lord Is Gathering His Army

I have often marveled at how much The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (often called the “Mormon Church”) focuses on the youth. I’ve noticed, while reading Alma chapter 56 (Alma 56), that our youth leaders are not unlike Helaman leading his stripling warriors into battle. In verse 47 (Alma 56:47) we learn that the sons of Helaman had never fought, but they were not afraid of death. Helaman tells Moroni how they fought with great ferocity, but acknowledged that they would not slay their brethren if their brethren would only have let them alone. The stripling warriors said that their mothers had taught them that if they do not doubt, God would deliver them. This was why they did not fear death, though they had never fought before.

The youth today parallel these boys very closely. Or at least the elect of our youth do. I still feel like we are youth, at least those of us who are pre-mission [young men may serve a mission for the LDS Church at age 18, and the young women at age 19]. And what I have seen here as a freshman at BYU has caused me to have more hope in the future. I know that somehow, we will make it. And like the stripling warriors, if we do not doubt God, not one of us will perish. We may be spiritually wounded along the way, but the Lord is bound to do what He promises. And He has promised that if we keep His commandments, and endure to the end, we shall have eternal life.

This last general conference [semi-annual, churchwide conference broadcast around the world], when President Monson made the missionary-age announcement, I knew immediately that I would be going. This call was as much for me as it was for everyone else. And then I thought “Wow, the Lord is gathering his army.” And when I was reading the story of the stripling warriors, I realized that they were His army then, and that is what we are now. We are the Lord’s stripling warriors.

There is a quote by Spencer W. Kimball, “Is it not time that we sent out a great army, not of uniformed men, but an army of missionaries to preach repentance to a world that is dying?” I am so excited to be a part of that army–to go out and save the people of Fiji like Helaman’s stripling warriors saved Antipus and his men, to protect the standard of liberty like Moroni. I feel this way because I know this gospel is true, and I know that those Fijian people are God’s children. They deserve the truth just as much as we do, and so I will bring it to them.

“And how be it my church save it be called in my name? For if a church be called in Moses’ name then it be Moses’ church; or if it be called in the name of a man then it be the church of a man; but if it be called in my name then it is my church, if it so be that they are built upon my gospel.” (Book of Mormon, 3 Nephi 27:8)

Jeffery R. Holland, a modern Apostle, has said that the Book of Mormon “should be considered the most remarkable and important religious text to be revealed since the writings of the New Testament were compiled nearly two millennia ago. Indeed, in its role of restoring plain and precious biblical truths that had been lost, while adding scores of new truths about Jesus Christ and preparing the way for the complete restoration of his gospel and the triumphant day of his millennial return, the Book of Mormon may be considered the most remarkable and important religious text ever given to the world.” (Christ and the New Covenant, 9-10)